Quince años de estabilidad en la conversión de votos en asientos de la diputación federal en México (2009-2024)
Son dos los sistemas “puros” de formación de la representación en las asambleas: el de mayoría relativa, por el que el primer lugar se lleva el asiento en disputa, favoreciendo la formación de mayorías; y el de representación proporcional, por el que cada contendiente obtiene los asientos que le corresponde según su votación, que disminuye la viabilidad de formación de mayorías. El dilema que resulta de la puesta en práctica de estos sistemas ha llevado al establecimiento de sistemas mixtos que buscan un equilibrio. En México, desde 1977, se han adoptado diversos sistemas con carácter compensatorio o esquema paralelo que topa la sobrerrepresentación.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Citas
Anaya Huertas, Alejandro. (2013). 20 años sin (la absurda) cláusula de gobernabilidad. El juego de la Corte, Nexos. https://eljuegodelacorte.nexos.com.mx/20-anos-sin-la-absurda-clausula-de-gobernabilidad/
Annan, Kofi. (2007). Speech on electoral governance. United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2007-03-15/speech-electoral-governance
Arter, David. (2013). Scandinavian Politics Today (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781847798154
Boix, Carles. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. The American Political Science Review, 93(3), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585577
Capablanca, José Raúl. (1921). Chess Fundamentals. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://archive.org/details/chessfundamental00capa
Centro de Capacitación Judicial Electoral. (s. f.). Sistemas electorales y de partidos. https://www.te.gob.mx/ccje/Archivos/presentaciones_capacitacion/sistemas_electorales.pdf
Córdova Vianello, Lorenzo. (2008). La reforma electoral y el cambio político en México. Reforma y democracia en América Latina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 653-690. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/6/ 2527/17.pdf
D’Hondt, Victor Joseph Auguste. (1878). Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle. Muquardt.
Elgie, Robert. (2003). Political Institutions in Contemporary France. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199240975.001.0001
Elklit, Jørgen. (2002). The Danish electoral system 1855–2001. Representation, 39(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034489022000005277
Elo, Arpad Emrick. (1978). The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present. Arco Publishing. https://archive.org/details/TheRatingOfChessPlayersPastAndPresent
Engstrom, Erik J. (2013). Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.3480926
Farrell, David M. (2011). Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34489-1
Gallagher, Michael. (1991). Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 10(1), 33–51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/ 026137949190004W
Gallagher, Michael, y Mitchell, Paul. (Eds.). (2005). The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-electoral-systems-9780199257560
Hooghe, Marc. (2008). Belgium: Hollowing the center. En Michael Gallagher y Paul Mitchell (Eds.), The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press, 383–408.
Instituto Nacional Electoral. (2024). Cómputos distritales 2024: Elecciones federales. https://computos2024.ine.mx/
Instituto Nacional Electoral. (s. f.). Atlas de resultados electorales federales 1991–2021. https://repositoriodocumental.ine.mx/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/126301/coe-1so-13-12-2021-p02-informe.pdf
Katz, Richard S., y Bardi, Luciano. (1999). The Italian electoral reform. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00450
Lasker, Emanuel. (1915). Lasker’s Manual of Chess. David McKay. https://archive.org/details/laskersmanualofc00lask
Lijphart, Arend. (2012). Patterns of Democracy (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300172027/patterns-of-democracy/
Lijphart, Arend. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford University Press.
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/electoral-systems-and-
party-systems-9780199283663
Loosemore, John, y Hanby, Victor. (1971). The theoretical limits of maximum distortion: Some analytic expressions for electoral systems. British Journal of Political Science, 1(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000067X
Murray, Harold James Ruthven. (1913). A History of Chess. Oxford University Press. https://www.loc.gov/item/2004677741/
Norris, Pippa. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790980
Parlett, David Sidney. (1999). The Oxford History of Board Games. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-history-of-board-games-9780192129982
Phillips, John A., y Smith, Charles B. (2013). The Great Reform Act of 1832. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139383044
Reilly, Benjamin. (2012). Institutional Design and Democratic Performance in Divided Societies. International Political Science Review, 33(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0192512111433472
Renwick, Alan. (2010). The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762383
Rule, Wilma. (1994). Women’s Underrepresentation and Electoral Systems. PS: Political Science and Politics, 27(4), 712–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500034612
Sartori, Giovanni. (1968). Political Parties and Democratic Theory. University of California Press. https://www.worldcat.org/title/political-parties-and-democratic-theory/oclc/437897
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, y Wattenberg, Martin P. (Eds.). (2001). Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019925768X.001.0001
Sunnucks, Anne. (1970). The Encyclopaedia of Chess. St. Martin’s Press. https://www.worldcat.org/title/841925
Taagepera, Rein. (2007). Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/predicting-party-sizes-9780199208005
Taagepera, Rein. (1973). Seats and Votes: A Generalization of the Cube Law of Elections. Social Science Research, 2(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(73)90007-9
Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación. (s. f.). El sistema electoral mixto y sus efectos en el sistema de partidos en México, pp. 228–229. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/13/6145/13.pdf
Virginia, Erin. (2016). Electoral Systems and Women’s Representation (Background Paper No. 2016-30-E). Library of Parliament, Ottawa, Canada. https://publications.gc.ca/ collections/collection_2016/bdp-lop/bp/YM32-2-2016-30-eng.pdf
Watson, John. (1998). Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy: Advances Since Nimzowitsch. Gambit Publications. https://archive.org/details/secretsofmodernc0000wats
Yalom, Marilyn. (2004). Birth of the Chess Queen: A History. HarperCollins. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/birth-of-the-chess-queen-marilyn-yalom
Yule, George Udny. (1918). The Nature and Measurement of Association between Two Things. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 81(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2341043
