https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/issue/feed Mexican Law Review 2023-08-09T16:11:16+00:00 John Mill Ackerman Rose mexlawrev@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p align="justify">"Mexican Law Review is a forum for the debate, research, and analysis of Mexican, Latin American, and comparative law. Submissions are receiving from any author independently of their geographical location and must pass through a double-blind peer-review process. MLR is published twice a year by the Institute for Legal Research of the National Autonomous University of Mexico".</p> <p align="justify"><a title="Privacy statement" href="https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/privacy-statement-mexican-law-review" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Privacy statement</a></p> https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18455 The Relevance of Climate Change to Contract Law 2023-08-09T15:18:33+00:00 Gonzalo Vial Fourcade vialfourcade@gmail.com <p>Climate change is a problem with an extremely wide scope, both in its consequences and in the solutions required to tackle it. In this context, this article reflects on whether climate change is a matter of legal significance to the field of contract law. As a conclusion, it is argued that the phenomenon is relevant for contract law for at least three reasons, namely: that such a legal field provides tools that are useful to address the climate problem; that the climate crisis raises several legal challenges for the field, and that climate change has altered the legal landscape of contract law and will continue to do so.</p> 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18456 Patents in Medicine and Health as an Integral Human Right 2023-08-09T15:38:42+00:00 Iliana Rodríguez Santibáñez ilrodrig@tec.mx <p>This article focuses on the relationship between medical patents and the right to health as an integral human right. The divergent interests involved in this issue are evaluated from the perspective of international law, which seeks to reconcile conflict through treaties and agreements of international organizations to find the balance best suited to benefit humanity. This study highlights the tension between patent law covering medicines and vaccines and the health needs of vulnerable populations in areas affected by armed conflicts and pandemics. In today’s globalized world, sometimes referred to as the knowledge society, conflicts between patent rights and the human right to health are best resolved using transparent international institutions designed to promote international cooperation.</p> 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18457 Report on Abusive Judicial Review of Electoral Matters 2023-08-09T15:50:40+00:00 José Oliveros Ruiz joseoliveros@outlook.com <p>It is commonplace to state that the borderline courts are the last obstacle in the defense of fundamental rights, the rule of law, the division of powers, and hence, of constitutional democracy. Nevertheless, there are judgments of last resort which are very illustrative examples of argumentative practices used to conceal decisions that may be systematically politicized, and therefore can be detrimental to fundamental electoral rights, to the certainty and legality of electoral acts and resolutions, as well as to the holding of free, authentic, and periodical elections. The practice of using the democratic legitimacy of the judicial function to intentionally undermine the core of democracy is barely theorized. However, it is highly possible that in the future these types of attack will be part of the authoritarian tools used by groups of an anti-democratic nature. That is to say, the circumstance that the courts and not the political actors are the ones that implement undemocratic measures with the advantage of the difficulty for its identification, given the traditional role assigned to the judiciary in the democratic constitutional state of law, makes it essential to review the use of the weighting of the argumentative representation. This, in order to prevent democracy from being damaged by constitutional interpretation and to avoid the tolerance for the absence of a minimum social consensus on the arguments that it intends to sustain with re-<br>lative temporary stability. Even more so, when it comes to those who make up the constitutional jurisdiction specialized in elections and democracy. In Mexico, the Superior Court of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (TEPJF) is the highest electoral court. This body has issued controversial and transcendent decisions for electoral democracy which can be subject to critical legal analysis as an input for legislative activity. This is particularly related to issues concerning citizen participation such as the revocation of mandate and the imposition of sanctions due to its diffusion by public servants, as well as cases of gender-based political violence (VPG, by its acronym in Spanish) and the deprivation of an honest way of living (MHV, by its acronym in Spanish) as a sanction. Another topic worth considering is the rulings on the modification or defective abandonment of the jurisprudence in matters such as the assumption of competence over parliamentary acts in the integration of the administrative or government bodies by the Congress of the Union, and the messages of the legislators, which are not protected by the principle of parliamentary immunity, as has been established.</p> 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18458 Narratives and Practices in Pre-Trial Hearings: A Legal Anthropological Approach to Judicial Efficiency 2023-08-09T15:55:05+00:00 Ricardo Iván Vásquez López nricado_vaz9793@outlook.com <p>This article aims to shed light on the practical organization of judicial operators in the pre-trial hearings of local Mexico City courts. Firstly, the aim is to describe cognitive, social, and objective formations, both conscious and volitional, linked to achieving the goals of the judicial bureaucracy in the practice of preliminary hearings in the justice system (the distribution, organization, and interpretation of the work) that take place and shape the social-judicial domain. Ethnographic observation and the narratives of agents in this field yield a theoretical framework formed by the actor-network theory, anthropological concepts from Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology and Bourdieu’s ideas of social field to provide a better description of agent practices in the field that produce a judicial “efficiency” that sustains, maintains, and drives the bureaucracy of the justice system, specifically during pre-trial hearings.</p> 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18460 Complate journal 2023-08-09T16:01:56+00:00 Mexican Law Review mlr.iij@unam.mx 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18454 Preliminary 2023-08-09T15:15:38+00:00 Mexican Law Review mlr.iij@unam.mx 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023 https://ijpc245.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/18459 Arraigo in Mexico: Violation of International Law 2023-08-09T15:58:59+00:00 Julio Martínez Hernández julio.martz33@gmail.com <p>For the development of this note, I will begin by exposing the different components, giving a brief introduction to the doctrines that make up public international law, its application in Mexico, general conception of human rights, international human rights framework, and human rights in Mexico, description of arraigo, its constitutional and legal basis, practices, and results for the achievement of justice. The intention is to establish if the practice of arraigo in Mexico constitutes a violation of the state’s international obligations.</p> 2023-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2023